Your View

Name Location
Message
Enter Security Code
 

 

Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]


Name Kate Location Oxford West

Message

I was shocked when I received my leaflet, I had no idea that Evan Harris was so arrogant that he wants to force people to have fluoride in their water, disgusting. What is he trying to do, kill people? Dr Death suits him!!


Name Rebecca Location Oxford

Message

Thanks for the leaflet, eye opening stuff. I saw the story yesterday of Harris saying it is not true what you say about him (over extending the time limit on abortion) and then he deleted the website links on his site where he has previously said he wants to extend the time limit! Looks like he is scared! How can we trust anyone who deletes things from public viewing when he is questioned??


Name Leaflets = Litter Location OW&A

Message

Given the choice, would you vote to be represented by a qualified and experienced medical doctor or a convicted arsonist? It's not really a tough call.


Name A true scientist Location Oxford

Message

Julie - from Headington: Keith Mann threatened the life of the director of the Wickham Laboratories, and received six month's gaol for it. In 1998 Keith Mann wrote "We are capable of dealing with anyone; no one has died yet, but that will come," He has been convicted of possession of explosives and of incitement to violence.

SO when you say he has never endangered a human being, you are a proven LIAR.


Name A true scientist Location Oxford

Message

ruth - from Glasgow - you write "Animals don't get the same conditions that us humans get so often they artificially induce the symptoms of these conditions and then work for a cure for the symptoms, how insane is that?" No, they induce the same conditions, then work for a cure for those conditions, and - guess what - it works! How do you think we found the cures for various breast cancers? I wonder what *you* will do if you ever get breast cancer?


Name A true scientist Location Oxford

Message

Kim - from Charlbury - was your condition mental illness?


Name A true scientist Location Oxford

Message

All these so-called Animal Liberationists are complete hypocrites: as soon as they are seriously ill they accept all the drugs and medical procedures that scientific experimenting has produced.


Name Adam Location Oxford

Message

Thank you for your disgusting and stupid leaflet. Any thinking person can now easily see that you're an idiot.


Name A true scientist Location Oxford

Message

It is not that natural medicines do not work for cancer and heart disease it is just the mainstream media do not report of the success cases.

And yes I do know people who have cured heart disease with hawthorn and high dose garlic and in alternative literature many success cases are listed. I myself would opt for this treatment.

And yes there are sucess stories with cancer without the treatment you suggest but it is not something you are likely to find in your medical jounals because the represent pharma interests.

A true scientist would know all of this.

When the Director of Research Defence Society, (which exists to defend vivisection) was asked if medical progress could have been achieved without animal use. His written reply was 'I am sure it could be'.

You haven't responded to any of the points I made below, how can you say animal testing is reliable after all the points I have raised?


Name Kim Location Charlbury

Message

Are you ignoring me true scientists? My condition was life threatening and by the time they dignosed me it was so acute I needed treatment immediately.

Once you have had an experience like mine you seek out other people who have been in similar situations and believe me there are many like me.

It is very naive to think that there is no other way to serious chronic conditions


Name Anon Location Oxford

Message

In your election leaflet you say: "Rats are used extensively yet they are only 37% effective in identifying what causes cancer to humans. Flipping a coin gives around 50% accuracy!" Come on man! Stop and think for just two seconds. You're suggesting that by flipping a coin you can accurately predict, 50% of the time, whether or not a substance causes cancer? Is it heads or tails that indicates a carcinogen? With wholly thinking like that your just making people think that those who object to animal testing are loons.


Name A true scientist Location Oxford

Message

Very witty. Use "a true scientist" to make it look like I am pro your absurd cause.

So alternative medicine works for certain conditions that are not life threatning.
What about cancer, heart disease, diabetes, strokes and other chronic illnesses that are the biggest killers in the Western world?

Do you propose we all just die rather than develop effective treatments against them? Alternative medicines DO NOT WORK for these conditions.


Name A true scientist Location Oxford

Message

Less than 2% of human illnesses (1.16%) are ever seen in animals.

95% of drugs passed by animal tests are immediately discarded as useless or dangerous to humans.

At least 50 drugs on the market cause cancer in laboratory animals. They are allowed because it is admitted the animal tests are not relevant.

Aspirin fails animal tests, as does digitalis (a heart drug), cancer treatments, insulin (causes animal birth defects), penicillin and other safe medicines. They would have been banned if vivisection were heeded.

In the court case when the manufacturers of Thalidomide were being tried, they were acquitted after numerous experts agreed that animal tests could not be relied on for human medicine.
Blood transfusions were delayed 200 years by animal studies, corneal transplants were delayed 90 years.

And for the record at least 450 methods exist with which we can replace animal experiments.


Name ruth Location glasgow

Message

Animals don't get the same conditions that us humans get so often they artificially induce the symptoms of these conditions and then work for a cure for the symptoms, how insane is that? It is not science, it is very backward.


Name Kim Location Charlbury

Message

I have had my life turned upside down by drugs my doctor gave me. After misdiagnosing me for 6 years I was in an awful state. Animal tested drugs did not help me, it was only went I stepped away from conventional drugs that I made progress so please think carefully before saying there is no alternative because many many people have found this alternative for themselves.


Name A true scientist Location Oxford

Message

Julie, anyone who has links to the Animal Liberation Front should be thoroughly ashamed of themselves.
They have bombed colleges and burnt down boat houses. What have Queen's college and rowers got to do with animal testing? Answer: nothing.
Pointless violence to stop animal testing? In my book that is disgusting behaviour and extremely detrimental to your cause.
Victimising people who have literally NOTHING to do with animal testing is pathetic.

Wouldn't you agree?


Name A Real Molecular Biologist Location Oxford

Message

Oh and one more thing, where do you think the vast majority of vetinary drugs come from. Oh yes the drugs that are found to efficacious on ANIMALS usually when they are being tested for human use. Without animal testing the development of vetinary medication would be retarded by several decades at the very least.


Name A Real Molecular Biologist Location Oxford

Message

18,000 people die every year in the UK due to drugs, do you think maybe, just maybe, that that figure might have a correlation with the fact that there is usually one common fact with the people being given drugs: THEY ARE ILL.

Noone wants to do vivisection, it's expensive, it's complicated, it has lots of regulation (quite rightly). There is a major reason we do engage in it however THERE ISN'T A VIABLE ALTERNATIVE. We would use all the alternatives you ever so wisely recommend with your no doubt in depth science educations IF THEY WORKED AND WERE PRACTICAL.

Fair play if you want to save all the animals by volunteering for testing on yourselves but until you are doing that you have no right to use any of vast majority (>99%) of medications that are tested on animals. Vegetarians don't like the concept of killing animals for food (generally) and guess what, THEY DON'T EAT MEAT!

Grow up.


Name Julie Location Headington

Message

Keith Mann has never endagered a human being, get the facts right. Keith Mann has rescued countless animals and for this he will always be my hero.

Millions of animals are tortured across UK Labs. Around 18,000 people die every year in the UK due to drugs passed as safe through animal tests, what about the criminals that allow this to happen?

Vivisection is bad science!


Name A true scientist Location Oxford

Message

Thank you very much for your leaflet about Evan Harris that you kindly posted through my front door. It made me chuckle for at least 5 minutes.
Keith Mann? That bloke that was imprisoned and has links with the Animal Liberation Front, members of whom tried to bomb Queen's college? That's right, obviously saving animals is done best by killing and harming other humans. Very clever.
Well when you get cancer or heart disease, good luck with those non-animal tested homeopathetic remedies. I'm sorry to say, you will definately die.


Name G Location Oxford

Message

Utter fuckwits.


Name Kay Location Bicester

Message

Looks like you have riled some nutty Harris supporters with the truth


Name Ollie Location Home

Message

Let's hope Oscar has had his fill of vaccines and that they do to him what they did to the animals they tested them on.


Name Oscar Location botley

Message

Your ludicrous hate message decided me, I'll vote for Harris after all. I hope next time they lock you up and throw away the key.


Name Jill Location Oxford

Message

Love what you are doing, I am grateful to have been informed about Evan Harris, thank you!


<< >>

Back to From Dusk 'til Dawn

 

Guestbook provided by AnvilBook.com
Click here to get your own free guestbook

Dog Names - Google SEO Company